Avaliação da resistência flexural em diferentes métodos de soldagem
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26843/ro_unicidv2932017p215-229Palavras-chave:
Soldagem, Lasers, Implantes dentários, Soldagem em odontologiaResumo
O objetivo do presente estudo foi avaliar três diferentes tipos de soldagem: Chama Direta a maçarico (convencional\brasagem), Solda Mista representada por fixação de dois pontos (Solda Elétrica Fixator - Kernit, Brasil), e completada com solda convencional, e o método de Solda a Laser (Soldadora Desktop - Sisma LM 500, Itália). Dois implantes plataforma Bränemark 4.1 mm (Neodent, Curitiba/Brasil) foram fixados em uma matriz de alumínio para simular uma ponte fixa implanto-suportada de três elementos. Os espécimes foram obtidos a partir de um bloco de cera CAD-CAM (Ceramill-Amammgirrbarch). Trinta e duas UCLAs hexágono externo foram fresadas e posteriormente unidas a uma barra pré-fabricada em cera com 2,5mm. Os corpos de prova foram fundidos em liga de cobalto-cromo simulando uma prótese fixa de três elementos. Esses espécimes foram divididos aleatoriamente e separados em três grupos (n=6): grupo A (solda chama direta), grupo B (solda mista), grupo C (solda laser). Os espécimes foram seccionados ao meio e unidos com resina acrílica para simular uma soldagem em prótese fixa. Os corpos foram soldados e tratados de acordo com a proposição. Após a soldagem os corpos de prova foram usinados e levados ao teste de flexão na técnica de três pontos. Os dados foram submetidos aos testes estatísticos de Tukey. Os cálculos estatísticos foram conduzidos adotando-se o nível de significância de 5% (α = 0,05). Houve diferença estatisticamente significativa entre os grupos soldados. Os resultados demonstraram valores mais elevados nos grupos A e B, solda convencional e solda mista, e menor valor no grupo C, solda a laser. No entanto, considerando a metodologia aplicada, a solda a laser mostrou uma menor resistência flexural comparada à soldagem convencional e mista, e a fixação prévia de solda elétrica com complemento de solda convencional (solda mista) não alterou a resistência flexural, produzindo resultado semelhante à solda convencional
Downloads
Referências
De Castro GC, De Araujo CA, Mesquita MF, Consani RL, Nobilo MA. Stress distribution in Co-Cr implant frameworks after laser or TIG welding. Brazilian dental journal 2013 24(2):147-51. Madhan Kumar S, Sethumadhava JR, Anand Kumar V, Manita G. Effects of conventional welding and laser welding on the tensile strength, ultimate tensile strength and surface characteristics of two cobalt-chromium alloys: a comparative study. Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society 2012 Jun;12(2):87-93. Rubo JH, Souza EA. Finite element analysis of stress in bone adjacent to dental implants. The Journal of oral implantology 2008 34(5):248-55. Baba N, Watanabe I, Liu J, Atsuta M. Mechanical strength of laser-welded cobalt-chromium alloy. Journal of biomedical materials research Part B, Applied biomaterials 2004 May 15;69(2):121-4. Schiffleger BE, Ziebert GJ, Dhuru VB, Brantley WA, Sigaroudi K. Comparison of accuracy of multiunit one-piece castings. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 1985 Dec;54(6):770-6. Torsello F, Di Torresanto VM, Ercoli C, Cordaro L. Evaluation of the marginal precision of one-piece complete arch titanium frameworks fabricated using five different methods for implant-supported restorations. Clinical oral implants research 2008 Aug;19(8):772-9. Atoui JA, Felipucci DN, Pagnano VO, Orsi IA, Nobilo MA, Bezzon OL. Tensile and flexural strength of commercially pure titanium submitted to laser and tungsten inert gas welds. Brazilian dental journal 2013 Nov- -Dec;24(6):630-4. Orsi IA, Raimundo LB, Bezzon OL, Nobilo MA, Kuri SE, Rovere CA, et al. Evaluation of anodic behavior of commercially pure titanium in tungsten inert gas and laser welds. Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists 2011 Dec;20(8):628-31. Chai T, Chou CK. Mechanical properties of laser-welded cast titanium joints under different conditions. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 1998 Apr;79(4):477-83. Silva TB, De Arruda Nobilo MA, Pessanha Henriques GE, Mesquita MF, Guimaraes MB. Influence of laser-welding and electroerosion on passive fit of implant-supported prosthesis. Stomatologija 2008 10(3):96-100. Hart CN, Wilson PR. Evaluation of welded titanium joints used with cantilevered implant-supported prostheses. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 2006 Jul;96(1):25-32. Rocha R, Pinheiro ALB, Villaverde AB. Flexural strength of pure Ti, Ni-Cr and Co-Cr alloys submitted to Nd:YAG laser or TIG welding. Brazilian dental journal 2006 17(1):20-3. NaBadalung DP, Nicholls JI. Laser welding of a cobalt-chromium removable partial denture alloy. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 1998 Mar;79(3):285-90. Anusavice KJ, Okabe T, Galloway SE, Hoyt DJ, Morse PK. Flexure test evaluation of presoldered base metal alloys. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 1985 Oct;54(4):507-17. Yannikakis S, Prombonas A. Improving the fit of implant prosthetics: an in vitro study. The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants 2013 Jan-Feb;28(1):126-34. Willis LM, Nicholls JI. Distortion in dental soldering as affected by gap distance. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 1980 Mar;43(3):272-8. Wiskott HW, Macheret F, Bussy F, Belser UC. Mechanical and elemental characterization of solder joints and welds using a gold-palladium alloy. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 1997 Jun;77(6):607-16. Chaves M, Vermilyea SG, Papazoglou E, Brantley WA. Effects of three soldering techniques on the strength of high-palladium alloy solder joints. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 1998 Jun;79(6):677-84. Angelini E, Pezzoli M, Rosalbino F, Zucchi F. Influence of corrosion on brazed joints' strength. Journal of dentistry 1991 Feb;19(1):56-61. S. Huling J, Ernest Clark R. Comparative distortion in three-unit fixed prostheses joined by laser welding, conventional soldering, or casting in one piece. J Dent Res 1977 56(2):128-34. Jemt T, Lekholm U. Measurements of bone and frame-work deformations induced by misfit of implant superstructures. A pilot study in rabbits. Clinical oral implants research 1998 Aug;9(4):272-80. Hulterström M, Nilsson U. Cobalt- -chromium as a framework material in implant-supported fixed prostheses: A 3-year follow-up. The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants 1991 9(1):449-54. Yoshinari M, Uzawa S, Komiyama Y. Hybrid framework with cobalt- -chromium alloy and gold cylinder for implant superstructure: Bond strength and corrosion resistance. Journal of prosthodontic research 2016 Oct;60(4):274-81. Blustein R, Depaul BM, Barnhart RC, Green KA. A reliable technique of post soldering of nonprecious ceramic units. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 1976 July;36(1):112-14.Srimaneepong V, Yoneyama T, Kobayashi E, Doi H, Hanawa T. Comparative study on torsional strength, ductility and fracture characteristics of laser-welded alpha+beta Ti-6Al-7Nb alloy, CP Titanium and Co-Cr alloy dental castings. Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials 2008 Jun;24(6):839- 45. Souza PCRD, Dinato JC, Bottino MA, Guastaldi AC. Brazing and laser welding of a Ni-Cr alloy. Braz Dent Sci 2000 3(2):7-16. Jemt T, Henry P, Linden B, Naert I, Weber H, Bergstrom C. A comparison of laser-welded titanium and conventional cast frameworks supported by implants in the partially edentulous jaw: a 3-year prospective multicenter study. The International journal of prosthodontics 2000 Jul-Aug;13(4):282-8. Lyra E Silva JP, Fernandes Neto AJ, Raposo LH, Novais VR, De Araujo CA, Cavalcante L A, et al. Effect of plasma welding parameters on the flexural strength of Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Brazilian dental journal 2012 23(6):686-91. Zupancic R, Legat A, Funduk N. Tensile strength and corrosion resistance of brazed and laser-welded cobalt-chromium alloy joints. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 2006 Oct;96(4):273- 82. Takayama Y, Nomoto R, Nakajima H, Ohkubo C. Effects of argon gas flow rate on laser-welding. Dental materials journal 2012 31(2):316-26.
